Legal Opinion
People v. Amador
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1970No. Crim. 17560PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Found guilty of second degree burglary by the court sitting without a jury, defendant was sentenced to state prison and appeals.
The residence of Mr. and Mrs. Koyama was burglarized some time between 11:40 a.m. on January 9, 1969, and 2 a.m. the next day. The front door was left open. A television set and a piggy bank had been taken. A window had apparently ,been forced as a means of entry. The piggy bank had been next to a Japanese doll case on top of the television set. A latent palm print identified as defendant’s was found on the Japanese doll case on January 10.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- People v. ShowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ZackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. BailesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Birt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. BeyahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.