Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1999No. 1999-0491PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 38.] THE STATE EX REL. CRIM, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.,

1999-Ohio-232.] Mandamus to compel Ohio Adult Parole Authority to credit relator’s sentence with his one-hundred-eight-day period of pretrial confinement—Denial of writ affirmed—Writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act that has already been performed. (No. 99-491—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eads v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Ohio Bur. of Sentence ComputationOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State ex rel. Lee v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API