Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1999No. 99-491PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act that has already been performed. State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 405, 406, 696 N.E.2d 581, 582.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Eads v. CallahanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Lee v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. SimmersOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Crim v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Lee v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Welch v. AveniOhio Court of Appeals · 2022