Haselden-Langley Constructors, Inc. v. D.E. Farr & Associates, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COYTE * , Judge.
Defendant, D.E. Farr & Associates, Inc., appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding damages to plaintiff, Haselden-Langley Constructors, Inc., on a theory of promissory estoppel. We reverse.
Plaintiff is a general contractor and defendant is a masonry construction company who submitted a bid for masonry work to plaintiff. Defendant had prepared its bid from the project plans and specifications provided by plaintiff. The total bid for masonry work only was $204,394. Defendant’s bid did not include any labor or materials for the installation of rigid, in-wall insulation.
Howe…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. ChildUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- N. Litterio & Company, Inc. v. Glassman Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Hedden v. LupinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- MOONY v. CraddockColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marquardt v. PerryColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Weitz Co. v. Hands, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Pickell v. Arizona Components Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Complete General Construction Co. v. Kard Welding, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- LAHR Construction Corp. v. J. Kozel & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.