Legal Opinion

Hedden v. Lupinsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1962No. Appeals, 374 and 375PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Mk. Justice Cohen,

In June, 1959, plaintiffs’ office received a telephone call from someone purporting to act on behalf of the defendant, Lupinsky, offering to do the ceramic tile work on a proposed addition to the Wilkes-Barre General Hospital, on which plaintiffs, as general contractors, planned to bid. Plaintiffs used defendant’s bid in computing their own bid for the general contract which was áivárded to them the following month. In August, plaintiffs sent defendant a contract which defendant Avas expected to sign along with certain bond forms and a copy of the specifications.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. MaffucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Cohn v. Penn Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Eastern Electric Sales Co. v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Mazzella v. KokenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Honeywell, Inc. v. American Standards Testing Bureau, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Quiles v. Financial Exchange Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Thomas Broadcasting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API