Legal Opinion
LAHR Construction Corp. v. J. Kozel & Son, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kenneth R. Fisher, J.
This is an action brought by a general contractor (LeCesse) against a subcontractor (Kozel) for damages resulting from the subcontractor’s failure to perform work on a project for which it had submitted an oral bid. The general contractor seeks *760recovery under theories of breach of contract and promissory estoppel. The subcontractor moves for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Kozel’s motion for summary judgment is granted and the complaint is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
In September of 1992, LeCesse prepared to bid on the so-called Omega Upgrade…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bunkoff General Contractors, Inc. v. Dunham Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Cairns & Associates, Inc. v. Conopco, Inc. (In re Cairns & Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Andrew R. Mancini Assoc., Inc. v. Murphy Excavating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019