Legal Opinion

Pickell v. Arizona Components Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1995No. 93CA1771PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

In this claim for promissory estoppel, defendant, Arizona Components Company, appeals from the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Cynthia Pickell, entered after a bench trial. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to amend her complaint. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiff was employed by an electronic components supplier. When defendant decided to expand its competing business in the Denver area, it contacted plaintiff and offered her a position. Although the new Denver office was to be a “start up” venture, defendant told her…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Kestenbaum v. Pennzoil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Pittman v. Larson Distributing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vinton v. Adam Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2005
  2. Mariani v. Rocky Mountain Hospital & Medical ServiceColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Pickell v. Arizona Components Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Price v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  5. DeFranco v. Storage Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API