R. J. Daum Const. Co. v. Child
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
Was there evidence from which it could reasonably be found that there was a meeting of the minds, thence a binding contract, is the question which this appeal presents. The trial court held as a matter of law that appellant did not accept respondents’ bid and dismissed appellant’s action. Plaintiff R. J. Daum Construction Company appeals. The dismissal was ordered at the pre-trial conference, after the parties had stipulated all of the evidence bearing on that question and each side had moved for a judgment in its favor on that question, appellant moved for a holding as a matter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Northwestern Engineering Co. v. EllermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Frederick Raff Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Thornton v. PaschUtah Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by48 opinions
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Cal Wadsworth Construction v. City of St. GeorgeUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Hines v. Overstock. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.