Legal Opinion
New York v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 16, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-2219 (JLB USCA, RCL, PLF)PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
On December 22, 1994, this Court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and issued an order declaring that the legislation creating certain additional judgeships in New York State did not have the purpose and would not have the effect of denying or abridging the right of racial minorities to vote. Defendant United States now moves this Court to reverse its grant of summary judgment and allow defendant to take additional discovery in this case.1 Because defendant’s motion to reconsider fails to identify either new evidence or a clear error of law, the motion…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Mississippi Ass'n of Cooperatives v. Farmers Home AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- National Trust for Historic Preservation v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Assassination Archives & Research Center v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
4Cited by81 opinions
- Habliston v. Finra Dispute Resolution, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Defenders of Wildlife v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail v. Federal Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Matthews v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Henderson v. RatnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.