Legal Opinion
National Trust for Historic Preservation v. Department of State
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-0627 (HHG), 91-1101 and 91-0564PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER.
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
This Court, in its April 14, 1993 Opinion and Order, left unresolved the question of whether the Foreign Mission — Board of Zoning Adjustment (“FM-BZA”) had “substantially complied” with local preservation laws pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. § 4306(d)(2). To briefly reiterate, the undecided issue was whether substantial compliance with local zoning laws necessarily entailed referring the matter to the Mayor’s Agent for Historic Preservation. See District of Columbia Landmark and Historic Preservation Act of 1979, D.C.Law 2-144; D.C.Code…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Wheeler v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by50 opinions
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Patton Boggs, LLP v. Chevron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Leidos, Inc. v. Hellenic RepublicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.