Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Ratner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 29, 2009No. Civil Action 09-141 (EGS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Jacqueline Ratner’s motion to dismiss and pro se plaintiff 1 David Henderson’s “Response to the Order of Dismissal” (“Reponse”). The Response will be construed as a motion to reconsider and/or to amend the complaint, and will be denied as futile. Ratner’s motion to dismiss will be granted, and the case will be dismissed in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff David E. Henderson, now a citizen of Texas, was employed with the State Department’s Foreign Service from 1969 to 1981, when he was involuntarily separated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hammond v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hammond v. D.C. Record CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010