Legal Opinion
Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail v. Federal Transit Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 22, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1471PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge
Currently before the Court are federal defendants’ Motion to Alter or to Amend the Court’s Judgment [Dkt. # 99], and defendant-intervenor Maryland’s Motion to Alter or to Amend the Court’s Judgment [Dkt. # 98], both filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). Upon careful consideration of the motions, the parties’ responses thereto, the prior motions for summary judgment, the applicable law, and the entire record in this case, I reaffirm my judgment that defendants violated the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail v. Federal Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- National Wildlife Federation v. LohrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017