Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 5, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-0569PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The Court previously determined that pro se prisoner plaintiff Alexander Otis Matthews accumulated three or more “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) before he filed this action. See Matthews v. FBI, 211 F.Supp.3d 148, 150 (D.D.C. 2016) 0Matthews I"). The Court then dismissed the action without prejudice. Id. Matthews now moves for reconsideration of the three-strikes determination under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Dkt. 32. In Matthews’s view, only one of the four prior actions which the Court identified…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Thompson v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- An opinion was released in case 22-5251, Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey v. AveryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- McFadden v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- MacIas-ochoa v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017