United States v. Rafael Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Rafael Rodriguez pleaded guilty to and was sentenced for conspiring to interfere with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), after he and two cohorts agreed to rob cocaine traffickers. Rodriguez raises four arguments on appeal: first, he maintains that section 1951 is unconstitutionally vague as it does not provide adequate notice of what conduct is prohibited under its provisions; second, he claims that the government’s evidence did not satisfy the Hobbs Act’s jurisdictional nexus; third, he asserts that Count Two of the indictment did not sufficiently…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Omar QaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Labrada-BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gammoh v. City of La HabraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.