Schroth v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff, Gertrude Schroth, a passenger on one of defendant’s cars, received injury caused by the car “running fast” and leaving the track at a curve. The negligence of defendant was conceded and the sole question for the jury was the extent of the injuries and amount of compensation to be allowed.
In the course of cross-examination of a physician called on behalf of defendant, counsel for plaintiff asked the following question: “And your best patient is the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company? A. I should say not; I should be in the poor house.” Objection to this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saxton v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Wagner v. Hazle TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Twinn v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Abel v. Northampton Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Cunningham v. Smith's Adm'rSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rice v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Myers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Mittleman v. BartikowskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Public National Bank & Trust Co. v. Enameled Metals Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Patanyi v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.