Legal Opinion

Myers v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1946No. Appeal, 40PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

This appeal raises the question whether in an action in assumpsit a plaintiff may be required to submit to a physical examination.

Plaintiff, Dr. Howard Myers, instituted suit in assumpsit to recover disability benefits alleged to be due him on two insurance policies issued by defendant, Travelers Insurance Company. Plaintiff averred that he contracted angina pectoris in 1940 and has been and is, at present, totally and permanently disabled. Defendant’s affidavit of defense denied plaintiff’s total and permanent disability.

Before trial of the issues…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Twinn v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Keasbey's Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Schroth v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Weston v. WestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SwantnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API