Legal Opinion

Mittleman v. Bartikowsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1925No. Appeal, 283PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

It is to be regretted that all members of the Bar do not always keep in mind what was said by this court years ago, that “A cause is not well tried unless fairly tried and a verdict obtained by incorrect statements or unfair argument or by an appeal to passion or prejudice stands on but little higher ground than one obtained by false testimony”: Saxton v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 219 Pa. 492, 495. The winning of a verdict should be a hollow reward to the advocate who has brought it to pass by appeals to a jury’s prejudices and not by the strength of the case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Wilhelm v. UttenweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Schroth v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Rock v. CauffielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Stephens v. SulkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Mirabel v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Robinson v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API