Twinn v. Noble
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 400, Jan, T.; 1921, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila Co., March T., 1920, No. 2747, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Fred Twinn v. Benjamin Noble. Trespass for personal injuries. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $10,000. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were instructions and rulings recited in the opinion of the Supreme Court, quoting the record.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
This action is for personal injuries sustained in a crossing accident. Lehigh Avenue, Philadelphia, extends in an easterly and westerly direction, crossing North Broad Street at right angles. On the evening of February 29, 1920, plaintiff while wallying westerly across Broad Street at Lehigh Avenue was struck and injured by a northbound automobile owned and driven by defendant. The case turned on questions of fact, as to which the evidence was conflicting. Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $10,000, and, from judgment entered thereon, defendant brought this appeal.
P…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Virgilio v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Anderson v. Wood, AppellantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Arnold v. McKelveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
3Cited by34 opinions
- Eckert v. Merchants Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Myers v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Nark v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- McKirryher v. YagerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.