Legal Opinion

Rountree v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1941No. 2 Div. 171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit is styled a statutory action in the nature of an ejectment for the recovery of real estate in a city and for damages for ‘the detention thereof. The plea of the defendant was that he was not guilty of the matters alleged.

There was an agreement of counsel as to the sufficiency of respective abstracts furnished on demand, Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 940, and that the same was not required to go back of the deeds from Robert T. Bryant, as executor of the last will and testament of James Mullen, deceased, one such deed being the first appearing in the abstract from said executor…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. YanceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Spradling v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Whitlow v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Mott v. HelmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Prestwood v. GilbreathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API