Legal Opinion

Whitlow v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1945No. 5 Div. 395PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Appellant sought to have the court locate and settle the boundary line between the coterminous lands of appellant and appellee and in the bill prayed that a survey be ordered to this end. The proceedings were pursuant to' Title 47, § 2 et seq., Code 1940.

Section 4 prescribes: “The judgment (of the court) shall locate and define the boundary lines involved by reference to well-known permanent landmarks, and if it shall be deemed for the interest of the parties, after the entry of judgment, the court may direct a competent surveyor to establish a permanent stone or iron…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roubicek v. RoubicekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Kabase v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Duke v. WimberlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. State v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Forest Hill Corp. v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Sparks v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. James v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Martin v. Birmingham Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Fortenberry v. ALA. DEPT. OF PENSIONS & SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API