Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cook

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1929No. 8 Div. 83PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

The bill in this case was filed by appellants, alleging a dispute between them and appellee as to a portion of the boundary line between two 40’s of land owned by them respectively. The bill, alleges that appellants and their predecessors have had adverse possession of their 40 up to a certain wire fence, and that appellee claims a strip of land, across said fence, and has taken possession of it by building another fence on the land of appellants. The bill is filed, as alleged, to establish the boundary line. There was no demurrer to the bill, but on final hearing relief was denied appellants.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Copeland v. WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. McNeil v. HaddenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Kubiszyn v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Sellers v. ValenzuelaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API