Legal Opinion

Mott v. Helmes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1944No. 4 Div. 353PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The errors assigned challenged the sustaining of the demurrer to the bill of complaint to enforce a lien under the statute for sanitary extensions and improvements. The suit is not against the municipality but against the property owners and lands indicated.

The bill of complaint was filed August 30, 1940, to enforce a lien arising from a public improvement assessment against certain property described in Exhibit “A” to the bill. The date of the first series of assessments declared upon is November 13, 1911. The date of-the second series is alleged to be of date of November 20,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Mulligan v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Steele v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. State v. MuddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Eddins v. PopwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Satellite Broadcasting Company v. TingleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API