Legal Opinion
LaPointe v. United Autoworkers Local 600
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 7, 1992No. 2:90-cv-73504PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) motion for summary judgment. For reasons hereafter stated, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant United Autoworkers Local 600 (“Local”) is an amalgamated union, meaning that its membership works for several different employers. The Local is thus divided into bargaining units, with each representing 600 or more employees. The various units have their own elected officers. 1
Each unit’s President has the authority to recommend individuals for appointment to other…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leo LaPOINTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOWORKERS LOCAL 600, and Doug Thompson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
- Garner v. Arvin Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- Crumm v. Oce'-Bruning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- Leo LaPOINTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOWORKERS LOCAL 600, and Doug Thompson, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993