State v. Tunney
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
— Barry M. Tunney was convicted of third degree assault of a police officer in King County. He challenges the sufficiency of the information for the first time on appeal, arguing it was defective because the Prosecutor omitted the necessary common law element that Mr. Tunney knew his victim was a police officer performing his official duties. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, State v. Tunney, 77 Wn. App. 929, 895 P.2d 13 (1995), and we granted review. We hold the element that Mr. Tunney *338knew the victim was a police officer can be fairly implied from the information, and Mr. Tunney…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HoltWashington Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. MoavenzadehWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. MoavenzadehWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. NonogWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. TunneyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.