State v. Nonog
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 — This case concerns whether the information charging the defendant with interfering with the reporting of domestic violence under RCW 9A.36.150 was constitutionally sufficient. The count charging interfering with reporting did not specify the underlying domestic violence crime but alleged that the defendant “committed a crime of domestic violence as defined by RCW 10.99.020” on a certain day. Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 11. Two other counts in the information charged specific domestic violence crimes occurring the same day. We hold that the information, when liberally construed, was sufficient…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ValdobinosWashington Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ZillyetteWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. PryWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.