Legal Opinion

State v. Tunney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1996No. 63116-6PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

917 P.2d 95 (1996)

129 Wash.2d 336

The STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Barry Michael TUNNEY, Petitioner.

No. 63116-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 27, 1996.

Decided May 30, 1996.

Joseph J. Lynch, Byron H. Ward, Seattle, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Jennifer Gilman, Deputy, Seattle, for respondent.

JOHNSON, Justice.

Barry M. Tunney was convicted of third degree assault of a police officer in King County. He challenges the sufficiency of the information for the first time on appeal, arguing it was defective because the Prosecutor omitted the necessary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MierzWashington Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. MoavenzadehWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. MoavenzadehWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. NonogWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API