Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Castle

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 24, 1995No. 05-94-00816-CVPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OVARD, Justice.

The Cadle Company (Cadle) appeals a judgment rendered on a written settlement agreement reached in an alternative dispute resolution procedure. In four points of error, Cadle contends the trial court erred in rendering judgment because the judgment: (1) is not supported by the pleadings; (2) is not supported by the evidence; (3) constitutes an improper consent judgment; and (4) does not conform to the written settlement agreement. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Mantas v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. West Beach Marina, Ltd. v. Erdeljac, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. Johnston v. McKinney American, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Avary v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API