Legal Opinion

Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INC

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1991No. D-0333PublishedCited by 519 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNYN, Justice.

Gordon Roark brought this action for specific performance of an alleged contract among Robert B. Stallworth, Jr.,1 Stall-worth Oil & Gas, Inc. (Respondents), and himself. The trial court rendered summary judgment for Respondents on the ground that they had conclusively established that there was no consideration for the alleged contract. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment. 811 S.W.2d 630. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to the trial court for a trial on the merits.

The alleged contract consists of a letter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by519 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

514 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API