Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1991No. D-0100PublishedCited by 353 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HIGHTOWER, Justice.

The issue before this court is whether a timely filed motion for new trial which is *510overruled by operation of law preserves appellate complaints of no evidence and factual insufficiency of the evidence to support a jury finding. The trial court, after a jury trial, rendered judgment concerning ownership of a certificate of deposit and the validity and delivery of a deed. Mildred Cecil (Cecil) timely filed a motion for new trial and an amended motion for new trial asserting, among other things, that there was no evidence and factually insufficient evidence to support…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  2. Cherne Industries, Inc. v. MagallanesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Commission of West HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Coulson v. Lake L.B.J. Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by353 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. C.M. Asfahl Agency v. Tensor Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. Stephanz v. Laird, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Webb v. Glenbrook Owners Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009

348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API