Legal Opinion
Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 3, 2002No. 01-11424PublishedCited by 332 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Herrmann Holdings, Ltd., AnnEm Investments, Ltd., and Herrmann Technology Trust (collectively, “the Herrmanns”) appeal the district court’s dismissal, for failure to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6), of their claims against Lucent Technologies Inc. (“Lucent”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
First we will summarize the facts alleged in the Herrmanns’ second amended complaint, which for purposes of Lucent’s motion to dismiss pursuant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fernando Jacquez v. R.K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by332 opinions
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Causey v. Sewell Cadillac-Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Carroll Ex Rel. Carroll v. Fort James Corp. Ex Rel. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
327 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.