Legal Opinion
Yost v. Millhouse
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 3, 1985No. CO-85-129PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant Dawn Yost obtained a default judgment in conciliation court against Lowell Millhouse for damages due to breach of express warranty and misrepresentation. Millhouse appealed the judgment to county court. The county court found for Yost and awarded her compensatory damages, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. The district court granted Millhouse’s request for a new trial. On retrial, the county court entered judgment for Millhouse, from which Yost appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
Dawn Yost, appellant, purchased two horses from respondent, Lowell Millhouse, in the fall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Head v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Lowrey v. DingmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Church of Nativity of Our Lord v. Watpro, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Lakeland Tool and Engineering, Inc. v. Thermo-Serv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.