State Ex Rel. Head v. Paulson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for amended findings or in the alternative to take additional testimony following an order allowing expenses and attorneys’ fees upon the state’s discontinuance of condemnation proceedings to take for highway use lands owned by defendants. The dispositive question presented is whether, upon the record submitted, the trial court’s finding of the reasonable value of the legal services is clearly erroneous. Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure. We hold that it is not.
After a commissioners’ award of $90,000 to defendants for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hempel v. HempelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Jensen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3Cited by57 opinions
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.