Legal Opinion

Hays v. Fischer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 13, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-090PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order enforcing an agreement between counsel by which appellant’s personal injury claim was settled for the sum of $10,500. Appellant presents the following issues for our consideration:(1) whether a settlement of a nineteen-year-old plaintiff’s personal injury claim can be enforced when she learns of a material change in her physical condition and other facts before she has received payment or executed release documents and chooses to reject the settlement documents despite her attorney’s previous acceptance of the settlement offer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zamouski v. GerrardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  2. Sheffield Poly-Glaz, Inc. v. HUMBOLDT GLASS, CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Kapiloff v. Askin Stores Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Langlois v. LangloisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Allen v. FewelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Emmons v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Canyon Contracting Co. v. Tohono O'Odham Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Robertson v. AllingArizona Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API