Legal Opinion

Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 23, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 90-150PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund (the Fund) is bound by a settlement agreement reached between an insolvent insurer and a third party prior to the insurer’s insolvency. Secondary issues concern the award of attorneys’ fees.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

For purposes of appeal, the facts are undisputed. Appellee Esther Betancourt and Lori Ogles were involved in an automobile accident on May 6, 1986. At the time of the accident, Ogles was insured by American Excel Insurance Company, with liability limits of $15,000 per…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HerderArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hays v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DeVane v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Emmons v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. A.H. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API