Legal Opinion
Zamouski v. Gerrard
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 3, 1971No. 71-21PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
The plaintiff, Julius Zamouski appeals from a judgment order which dismissed his complaint as to all defendants with prejudice and denied him leave to amend.
Count I of the complaint alleges in substance that on March 26th, 1970, the defendant LaSalle National Insurance Company (or its predecessor La Salle Casualty Company), acting by and through attorneys Michael A. Gerrard and Peter S. Switzer from the firm of Barrick, Jaskson & Switzer, accepted plaintiff’s offer to settle a personal injury claim against La Salle’s insureds for $125,000; and that after plaintiff discontinued all…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Fanning v. LeMayIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Deasey v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Lowrey v. MalkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Belden Corp. v. InterNorth, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Berlin v. NathanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Alan M. Gold and Alan M. Gold Development Company v. Alan B. WolpertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Audition Division, Ltd. v. Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Chicago, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.