Robertson v. Alling
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice TIMMER,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Agreements between parties or attorneys in civil lawsuits are not binding if disputed unless they are evidenced by a writing or made orally in court. Ariz. R. Civ. P. 80(d). We here consider whether Rule 80(d) makes a written settlement agreement unenforceable because it lacked the written assent of clients who dispute their attorney’s authority to make the agreement. Holding that no such written assent is required and that the agreement here satisfied Rule 80(d), we also conclude that it is enforceable because the attorney acted within the apparent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-MercadoArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Panzino v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. WelchArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Wildwood Creek Ranch, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stafford v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Aikens v. Sahuarita, Town ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Chad Scott Lawrence v. Joesph Bendel, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Harris v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Metropolitan v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.