Legal Opinion
Hopper v. Elliott
California Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1937No. L. A. 15675PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff is one of eight persons who on the tenth day of September, 1909, posted notice of a placer mining location on the northwest quarter (N. W. 14) of section two (2), township twenty-two (22), south range seventeen (17) E. M. D. M., and being 160 acres of the public domain in the Kettleman Hills district. A copy thereof was recorded in the office of the county recorder of Kern County on the twenty-eighth day of November, 1909, which was one day after the President of the United States made his order withdrawing the lands from entry. This action -was commenced for the purpose of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Mike & Starr Gold & Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morrow v. Coast Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Barnard v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950