Legal Opinion

United States v. County of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1992No. 91-55321PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

The United States of America (government) appeals from a district court decision denying its motion for summary judgment and granting partial summary judgment to the County of San Diego (County). We are presented with the question of whether General Atomics, a federal contractor, has an independent possessory interest in a government-owned experimental fusion device (device) subject to California’s ad valorem property tax. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Township of MuskegonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. County of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles Assessment Appeals Board No. 1California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. City of San Jose v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Lebron Diaz v. General Security Services Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
  5. CALIFORNIA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API