United States v. Township of Muskegon
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
As the Government points out in its jurisdictional statement “this appeal presents precisely the same basic question” as is raised in No. 26, United States v. City of Detroit, ante, p. 466, also decided today. That question is whether Public Act 189, of 1953, of the State of Michigan is unconstitutional as applied to a corporation using government property in connection with a business conducted for its own private gain.
In this case the United States owns a manufacturing plant at Muskegon, Michigan. In 1952 it granted Continental Motors Corporation the right to use this plant in the course of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Curry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wilson v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Township of Muskegon v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by140 opinions
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.