Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1964No. 185PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co., 342 U. S. 232, it was held that § 9 (b) of the Atomic Energy Act1 barred the collection of the Tennessee sales and use tax in connection with sales to private companies of personal property used by them in fulfilling their contracts with the Atomic Energy Commission. In 1953, Congress repealed the statutory immunity for activities and properties of the AEC contained in § 9 (b) in order to place Atomic Energy Commission contractors on the same footing as other contractors performing work for the Government.2 In 1955 Tennessee amended its statute by adding a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Strayhorn v. Raytheon E-Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  3. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'n v. Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, a United States Corporation v. Metrocentre Improvement District 1, City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Rho Company v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1989

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API