Legal Opinion

CALIFORNIA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1996No. 95-55205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

The City of Anaheim (“Anaheim”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the California Credit Union League (“League”). The League successfully sought a declaratoiy judgment that the city’s application of its transient occupancy tax to credit union employees staying in local hotels violated 12 U.S.C. § 1768. Both parties agreed before the district court that the case should be resolved by summary judgment. The district court awarded summary judgment to the League. After reviewing de novo, Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Credit Union League v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. In Re TruskoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  4. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API