Legal Opinion

Kalez v. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1906No. 5881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county Kennan, J., entered December 19, 1904, upon findings' in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for an injunction and damages on account of interfering with the waters of a lake.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

— Appellants are the owners of a leasehold interest in certain lands bordering upon Liberty Lake, a body of water a mile and a half long by three quarters of a mile wide, situated in Spokane county, which lake is much fre*47quented as a pleasure resort. Appellants acquired possession, in October, 1903, under a five year lease of the premises, which extend about a mile along the side of said lake, agreeing to pay a rental of $1,000 per year. It was the purpose of appellants to let bath houses, boats, and otherwise contribute to the demands of pleasure-seekers visiting said lake. There was a sandy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monroe Mill Co. v. MenzelWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Sultan Water & Power Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Dawson v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Carl v. West Aberdeen Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Austin v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ortel v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Best v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API