Legal Opinion

Dawson v. McMillan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1904No. 4913PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered March 26, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, restraining the obstruction of navigation.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

Plaintiffs brought this' action for an injunction restraining defendants from obstructing navigation in the branch of the sea known as McElroy’s slough, and for a mandate requiring the removal of such obstruction already made by defendants. After issues joined *270and a trial had, the lower court granted the relief prayed for. The defendants appeal.

No question is made here on the findings of the lower court, and they are therefore to be taken as true. They are as follows:

“(1) That at all of the times in plaintiffs’ complaint mentioned and hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiffs have been and are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. City of New Whatcom v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Sultan Water & Power Co. v. Weyerhauser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API