Legal Opinion

Carl v. West Aberdeen Land & Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1896No. 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Chehalis County.— Hon. Mason Irwin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

The complainants were in lawful possession of lands situated on or near the river Neuskah in Chehalis county. From such lands they had cut and put into said river a large amount of sawlogs. The only means of taking them to market was by way of said river, which was of such a character as to make it easily practicable to float the logs down it. Near the mouth of said river defendants had erected a dam which entirely closed the channel. In the middle thereof was a gate through which logs could be passed one or two at a time. The logs in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Middleton v. Flat River Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dormitzer v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API