Legal Opinion

Hill v. Laventhol & Horwath

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County

Decided December 21, 1983No. 28Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPICER, P.J.,

Defendant has moved for summary judgment on grounds that the statute of limitations bars plaintiffs’ cause of action.

Plaintiffs were shareholders in a corporation which sold its assets and was dissolved in 1968. Defendant was engaged to structure the dissolution and distributions in connection therewith so as to minimize individual tax liabilities. Defendant, through an employee, arranged two settlements in late 1968 and early 1969 with a goal of dividing capital gains over two years. Unfortunately, the manner in which distribution was actually made threw the entire gain in 1969.

A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Taylor v. TukanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Moonie v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Chisholm v. ScottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API