Legal Opinion

Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, 319PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint in assumpsit for damages arising from the alleged breach of implied warranties of fitness for intended purpose and merchantable quality.

The complaint was filed July 12, 1960. It alleged that in March of 1956, in Philadelphia, plaintiff, Clementino Rufo, purchased from one J. F. Martin a refilled, portable cylinder of liquified gas for use in a torch in connection with his work, that defendant, Bastian-Blessing Company, manufactured a valve connected with such cylinder, that defendant impliedly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Delhi-Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Marucci v. LippmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Engelmam v. Eastern Light Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County1962

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Callery v. Blythe Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Duquesne Slag Products Co. v. LenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Truck & Concrete Equipment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API