Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Scott

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1974No. 1301PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court dismissing their amended complaint alleging that the defendants, certified public accountants, negligently prepared certain federal income tax returns, on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse.

The issue on appeal concerns the time from which the statute of limitations runs. The general statute § 23 — 1—1, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Vol. 5) reads as follows:

“23-1-1. Limitation on time of bringing actions. — The following suits or actions may be brought within the time hereinafter limited,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moonie v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Roybal v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Spurlin v. Paul Brown Agency, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API