Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Tukanowicz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. 358PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees under Pa.R.C.P. No. 1035. The lower court’s grant of summary judgment in this malpractice action was premised upon the expiration of the two year personal injury statute of limitations prescribed by 12 P.S. § 34. 1 We reverse.

In April 1972, appellant Taylor underwent back surgery (a laminectomy) performed by appellee doctors Tukanowicz and El-Attrache at Frick Hospital. This operation is the act from which the malpractice action arises. Taylor’s deposi tion testimony establishes that the following events…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Lee v. MihalichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. DeMartino v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API