Nasaka v. Data Access Systems
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
At issue before the Court is a novel claim requiring an interpretation of the District of Columbia Compulsory/No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act of 1982 (“D.C. No-Fault Law”), D.C. Law 4-155, D.C.Code § 35-2101, et seq. (1984 Supp.) Plaintiff claims that his status as a taxicab driver renders him exempt from the provisions of the D.C. No-Fault Law. Thus, plaintiff argues, he may proceed with this diversity action despite the No-Fault Law’s limits on civil liability actions, which would otherwise bar his claims.
In brief, the complaint alleges…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Quern v. MandleySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Underhill v. Safeco InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Roosevelt F. Palmore v. Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Braden v. SpencerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. CollinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Coleman v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Johnson v. Cumis Insurance SocietyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Arthur v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985