Johnson v. Cumis Insurance Society
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
This is a diversity action concerning the scope of coverage afforded by an insurance policy. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. The sole question before the Court is whether, as a matter of law, plaintiff Kimberly Ann Johnson was covered by the insurance policy on the day her *1172car struck and killed a pedestrian. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that Kimberly Ann Johnson was not covered by the policy on the day of the fatal accident. Accordingly, summary judgment is entered for the defendant.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
The material facts are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mills Music, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Unification Church v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- District Properties Associates v. The District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Atwater v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Tapscott v. Dairyland InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987